Legal Opinion

Junikl v. Miami Savings & Loan Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1943No. 1761PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, J.

By reason of the type of appeal, on questions of law and fact, it becomes our obligation to determine this cause as upon original presentation. The question presented is an issue of fact, namely, whether or not the plaintiff during the period that he had funds nlaced with the defendant company was a stockholder or a special depositor. This case is but *312one, of a number of cases, which we have considered involving the same question and in some particulars, is more definite and more satisfactory in proof than many which we have heretofore determined.

The effect of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blesi v. Miami Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API