Lisenby v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Dissent · HarrisCarleton Harris, Chief Justice
I agree with the Court that this case should be reversed, but I would not reverse and dismiss; rather, I would remand for another trial.
It is my view that the Court committed error in giving its instruction No. 5. That instruction reads as follows:
When persons combine to do an unlawful thing, if the act of one, proceeding according to common plan, terminates in a criminal result, though not the particular result meant, all are liable.
If the defendants, or either of them, drew a weapon on Norman Hall and Richard James, their victims, with the common intent to effect an unlawful theft of…
Also in this document: Dissent · Fogleman.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- People v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- People v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Commonwealth v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Caton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Commonwealth v. DevereauxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.