Legal Opinion

Lisenby v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 8, 1976No. CR 76-47Published

1Dissent · HarrisCarleton Harris, Chief Justice

I agree with the Court that this case should be reversed, but I would not reverse and dismiss; rather, I would remand for another trial.

It is my view that the Court committed error in giving its instruction No. 5. That instruction reads as follows:

When persons combine to do an unlawful thing, if the act of one, proceeding according to common plan, terminates in a criminal result, though not the particular result meant, all are liable.

If the defendants, or either of them, drew a weapon on Norman Hall and Richard James, their victims, with the common intent to effect an unlawful theft of…

Also in this document: Dissent · Fogleman.

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. People v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. People v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Caton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. DevereauxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API