Hawkins v. Kourlias
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtStaton, J.
James Kourlias received a jury verdict upon *160his counterclaim in the sum of $13,100.00. Roland O. Hawkins is appealing the verdict rendered against him and contends:
1) That the verdict is excessive;
2) That the verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence; and
3) That the verdict is contrary to law.
We affirm the verdict and judgment of the trial court in the opinion that follows:
James Kourlias, a seventy-five year old retired fruit peddler, offered his home for sale. Roland O. Plawkins, an operating engineer, offered him $10,000.00 and a life estate in the upstairs apartment with kitchen…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Turner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Wolford v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Annee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- ANNEE, ETC. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Price v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kourlias v. HawkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972