Moore v. Schank
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.
This is an action to recover the balance due on an open account for goods sold- and delivered. Plaintiff recovered a judgment. Defendant’ appeals. We require a remittitur and, subject thereto, affirm.
After several pleadings had been filed in this action, plaintiff secured permission to file and filed an amended petition. This matter went to trial upon the issues presented by plaintiff’s amended petition; defendant’s answer, counter-claim, and set-off; and plaintiff’s reply and answer to counter-claim.
Plaintiff’s petition sets out four causes of action. In the first cause of action plaintiff…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rhoads v. Columbia Fire Underwriters AgencyNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Faught v. Dawson County Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Garneau v. Omaha Printing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by10 opinions
- Colvin v. John Powell & CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Lundt v. PARSONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
- Bear v. AuguyNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Underwriters Acceptance Corporation v. DunkinNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Izumi v. Kwan Doo ParkHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.