Valley Butter Co. v. Minnesota Coöperative Creameries Ass'n
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,
The court below refused to quash a writ of foreign attachment ; defendant has appealed. The principal questions involved are, (1) Does the record show that the funds attached were received by the garnishee as a special agent of defendant fixed with a trust relation to the latter? and (2) Should the writ have been quashed on that ground?
Plaintiff corporation summoned itself as garnishee, for the funds in question were in its own hands. It is well established that a plaintiff in foreign attachment may attach money in its own hands: Pasquinelli v. Southern…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pasquinelli v. Southern Macaroni Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Tagg v. BowmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- Hostetter v. GiffenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kelter v. American Bankers Finance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Johnston & Harder, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Abrahams, Adrx. v. Wilson, MayorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Mass. B. I. Co. v. J. H., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Roxborough Trust Company's CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.