Legal Opinion

Manischewitz Food Products, Inc. v. Rosenberg

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1949No. 8730PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANEY, District Judge.

This case arises upon a motion to dismiss the complaint in an action for injunctive relief. Such relief is sought to prevent irreparable injury to plaintiff’s good will and name in connection with its business. Jurisdiction of this court is based on the existence of diversity of citizenship between the parties and the involvement of the statutory sum of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000) ,1

The complaint, in substance, states as follows: Plaintiff, a New York corporation, is engaged in the distribution and sale of various food products prepared *116in strict accordance with the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bitterman v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Hunt v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. A. & P. Radio Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Caron Corporation v. Wolf Drug Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
  5. Hess v. Factors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ar-Tik Systems, Inc. v. Dairy Queen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  2. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. v. Shelley Knitting Mills, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Ar-Tik Systems, Inc. v. Dairy Queen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API