Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Balthrop Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 29, 1981No. 81-95-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNER, Judge.

The issues presented are whether the jury’s verdict is supported by evidence and whether the trial judge correctly excluded from evidence, as an offer of settlement, an exhibit offered by defendant.

The defendant-appellant, City of Lafayette, Tennessee,1 installed a new water system. Balthrop Construction Company *23was the contractor. The plaintiffs, Randall and Joann Goodman, paid a tap fee to Lafayette to obtain city water at their home on August 29, 1977. Subsequently, on March 18, 1978, an employee of the city installed the water meter. At that time Mr. Goodman connected…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Truan v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Jones v. Lenoir City Car WorksTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Davis v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
  4. Chattanooga Gas Company v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  5. Clinard v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Duran v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  2. Pankow v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  3. Hobson v. First State BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  4. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. Security Land Co. v. TouliatosTennessee Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API