Sebring v. Hazard
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo; Adams, J. Assumpsit by Theron T. Sebring against Charles H. Hazard on a promissory note. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.
The defendant and one James McDougal were engaged in the business of roofing. The *331plaintiff was the agent for the National Life Insurance Company. In October, 1898, the plaintiff delivered to the defendant a binding receipt, and, later on, a policy, in the sum of $1,000, in said company. At the time of the delivery of the policy, a promissory note for the amount of the premium was given. This note matured, and was not paid, and on March 1, 1899, was renewed by the giving of the note in suit, the amount of which is $31.10. This action is brought upon this note. The defense interposed is that,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Northern Assurance Co. v. MeyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1916