Legal Opinion

Federal Insurance v. United Port Service Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAron Steuer, J.

In three actions based on essentially similar facts plaintiffs sue as insurers subrogated to the rights of their assureds. The form of the complaints is for breach of contract of bailment. Defendant stored goods on piers for plaintiffs’ assureds and the goods were injured or destroyed by rising waters. Suit in each instance was begun more than three years and less than six years after the incidents causing the damage. The motions are to dismiss the complaints pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, as jbeing barred by the Statute of Limitations. The question is whether the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. RCR Services Inc. v. Herbil Holding Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Seven Sixty Travel, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Tischler Roofing & Sheet Metal Works Co. v. Sicolo Garage, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1970
  4. Federal Insurance v. United Port Service Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  5. Klein v. Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API