Legal Opinion

Rokos v. Peck

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1986No. B013576PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, J.

Plaintiffs Kathy Bucuzzo and Wilda Rokos instituted this action against defendants American Broadcasting Company (ABC), Harold Sitowitz, Dr. Michael Peck, and the Suicide Prevention Center (Center) et al. to recover damages allegedly arising out of the unauthorized use of Bucuzzo’s unpublished literary works dealing with the problem of teenage suicide. The complaint, stating causes of action for plagiarism, breach of an implied-in-fact contract, and unjust enrichment, generally averred that Bucuzzo’s writings served as the basis for an ABC television production also dealing…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Stanley v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Golding v. R.K.O. Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Filia Kourtis Con Kourtis v. James Cameron International Creative Management Mario P. Kassar Jeffrey Berg Joseph RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Benay v. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Selby v. New Line Cinema Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2000
  5. Goldberg v. CameronDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API