Legal Opinion

Mead v. Scott

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1964No. 51473PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.

Plaintiff Paul B. Mead, as administrator of his deceased son’s estate, brought this law action to recover for his death against the Chieag’o & North Western Railway Company, L. W. Scott, engineer of the freight train that collided with the automobile in which decedent was a passenger, and David M. Risdal, owner of the automobile being driven with his consent. Recovery was sought from the railroad and Scott on the ground they were negligent in operating the train and from Risdal on the ground his son drove the automobile recklessly. Following trial there was a jury verdict for all defendants.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Law Ex Rel. Law v. HemmingsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  2. Jackson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. Plumb v. Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  4. Johnson v. KinneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. Bashford v. SlaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Twyford v. WeberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Good v. AB Chance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Adams v. DeurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. Cory v. Ankeny State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. State v. HephnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API