Legal Opinion

Nokes v. Nokes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1976No. 76-59PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per . .Curiam:

In recent years, numerous, states, afteir statutorily reducing their , age of majority;, from 21 to 18, have, been asked to decide whether,, and to what , extent,[ decretal provisions .for child' support until majority or. .emancipation are affected by the law. The resulting decisions are contradictory and irreconcilable, and, accordingly, a rpvieyr thereof would serve little purpose herein.• ;: ’ We start with the proposition that a court retains. continuing jurisdiction over child support orders contained in divorce decrees (Van Divort v. Van Divort [1956], 165 Ohio St. 141,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Thiessen v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Tullis v. TullisOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bode v. WelchOhio Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Miller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cook v. MatvejsOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In re Dissolution of Marriage of LazorOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Rosenfeld v. RosenfeldOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Bugay v. BugayOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. In re Adoption of B.I. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API