Nokes v. Nokes
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Per . .Curiam:
In recent years, numerous, states, afteir statutorily reducing their , age of majority;, from 21 to 18, have, been asked to decide whether,, and to what , extent,[ decretal provisions .for child' support until majority or. .emancipation are affected by the law. The resulting decisions are contradictory and irreconcilable, and, accordingly, a rpvieyr thereof would serve little purpose herein.• ;: ’ We start with the proposition that a court retains. continuing jurisdiction over child support orders contained in divorce decrees (Van Divort v. Van Divort [1956], 165 Ohio St. 141,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wolfe v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Thiessen v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1922
- Tullis v. TullisOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Bode v. WelchOhio Supreme Court · 1875
- Miller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cook v. MatvejsOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- In re Dissolution of Marriage of LazorOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Rosenfeld v. RosenfeldOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Bugay v. BugayOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
- In re Adoption of B.I. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.