Pereloma v. Valenteychik

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.H.O.), dated February 21, 2006, as, after an inquest, awarded her the principal sum of only $45,000 in damages and $23,000 in legal fees against the defendants Roman Veksler, Ludmila Martemyanova, Irene Martemyanova, and Sunshine Venture Corp.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see CPLR 5701 [c]); and…