Legal Opinion

Mead Corporation v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 2, 1975No. SC 1211PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*15FAULKNER, Justice.

The City of Birmingham filed a petition for writ of mandamus, praying that this court require Judge Pickens to transfer the cause to the Birmingham Division. We grant the writ.

On February 4, 1975, the City Council of Birmingham adopted a resolution of annexation of certain territory located outside the city limits. An election was ordered to be held on March 8, by the Probate Judge. Meanwhile, on February 17, Mead Corporation filed a complaint in the Bessemer Division of the Circuit Court challenging the legality of the election, and seeking a temporary restraining order,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Central of Georgia Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Ex parte Southern Building Code CongressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Walter Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ex Parte City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Ex Parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Mead Corp. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. City of Birmingham v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API