Legal Opinion

Whitmer v. Whitmer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1976No. 662, 688PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN der VOORT, Judge.

Appellant brings this action for partition of jointly owned personal property located in Pennsylvania. Her claim to the property rests upon a judgment awarding *465her this property interest as “lump sum alimony” in a Florida divorce action. Appellee’s defense is a collateral attack on the Florida judgment as having been entered without due process of law and without jurisdiction over the Pennsylvania property.

The parties were married in Pennsylvania in 1946 and lived in this state until 1971 when appellant moved to Florida and established her domicile there. Appellee resides…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Johnson v. MuelbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Rose v. HimelySupreme Court of the United States · 1808
  4. Overby v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Michigan Trust Co. v. FerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sohmer v. SohmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Wildcatt v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Fatzinger v. City of AllentownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. General Electric Capital Corp. v. East Coast Yacht Sales Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Taddei v. TaddeiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API