Legal Opinion

Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. Zehner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1896No. 1,854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

The first alleged error assigned by appellant’s counsel relates to the overruling of appellant’s demurrer to appellee’s complaint.

Omitting the mere formal parts, the complaint is as follows:

“Said plaintiff, for amended complaint, and by *274leave of court iir.st obtained, complains of said defendant and says, that the defendant is a corporation, duly organized under the laws of the State of Indiana, under the name of the Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad Company, and that said defendant company now is, and for several years last past has been, operating, among others, a line of railroad,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hanson v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Polly v. McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  4. Roundtree v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  5. Nowlin v. WhippleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. ZehnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. ZehnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API