State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Stanley v. Stanley
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtPolston, J.
The trial court decreased the amount of child support paid by Appellee, citing various independent substantial changes in circumstances. We affirm the trial court’s ruling on one of the grounds:
In two previous orders, income was imputed to Dennis E. Stanley based on his presumed ability to obtain work in his business. Extensive testimony at this hearing established that actual business opportunities do not meet the previously presumed levels of activity, thus rendering further imputation of income factually untenable.
We do not reach the other reasons relied on by the trial court,
The trial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ensley v. EnsleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Hogle v. HogleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Aarts v. AartsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hagan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001