Eklund v. Pinkey
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Coccoma, J.), entered November 21, 2005 in Delaware County, which, inter alia, declared that a restriction on the transfer of certain stock applied only to voluntary transfers.
As described more fully in our decision in a prior related action (Eklund v Pinkey, 27 AD3d 878 [2006]), the parties are family members who own shares in four closely-held corporations. Under the bylaws of each corporation, the parties’ shares are subject to a covenant restricting their transferability by giving first the corporation and then the other shareholders the right to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Friedman v. Beway Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re Pace Photographers, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Eklund v. PinkeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eklund v. PinkeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Dissolution of Eklund Farm Machinery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Dissolution of Eklund Farm Machinery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010