Legal Opinion

Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1940No. 34,696PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel the defendants as state officials to refund to plaintiff certain money which it is alleged was unlawfully assessed and paid under protest *231to the defendant insurance commissioner and now held as a trust fund by the defendant state treasurer.

For a number of years prior to 1936 the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California (hereinafter referred to as the old company) was authorized to and did business in Kansas as a foreign life insurance company. On July 22, 1936, in a court of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. City of Newton v. AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. State v. Georgia Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Smrha v. General American Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Guilford v. . Georgia Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Callaway v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. HobbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. Aetna Insurance v. HobbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Lincoln National Life Ins. v. Read, Ins. Commr.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. HobbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API