Legal Opinion
Marden v. Howard
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 5, 1922PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJenney, J.
The plaintiffs, who are brokers, bring this action to recover for services in obtaining a customer for real estate in Lowell. Three of the defendants, Albert S. Howard, Rowena Palmer, and Albert W. Thompson, are trustees of the Hildreth Estate Trust Association under a declaration of trust. The property whose sale is in question had been conveyed to them, or to their predecessors in trust, to be held in accordance with the declaration. Each of said defendants held shares in the association individually. Thompson, Thomas Nesmith, Jr., and Fisher H. Nesmith, as trustees of the Thomas Nesmith…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Adams v. DickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Cadigan v. CrabtreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Doten v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Cadigan v. CrabtreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Smith v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Elliott v. KazajianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Merrimac Chemical Co. v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Vigneault v. Dr. Hewson Dental Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Lunn & Sweet Co. v. WolfmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Walsh v. CornwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.