Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lawless

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 7, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The jury as originally empanelled consisted of twelve men. But, after the trial began and some evidence had been introduced, one of the jurors informed the trial judge that he was disqualified and the judge with the consent of the parties excused him. The defendant having agreed to proceed with eleven jurors, the trial was resumed, and resulted in the conviction of the defendant for committing the misdemeanor with which he was charged under G. L. c. 273, § 11. The defendant at the close of the evidence moved “that the jury may be discharged and a mistrial declared on the ground and for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. State v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. Commonwealth v. RoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Darst v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Hellen v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The People v. ScudieriIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Gallo v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. Commonwealth v. PikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Commonwealth v. McCasterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API