Perkins Glue Co. v. Hood
District Court, W.D. Michigan
In Equity. Suits by the Perkins Glue Company against Fred E-Hood and others, doing business under the firm name of Hood & Wright, and against the West Michigan Furniture Company and George P. Hummer.
1Opinion of the Court
SESSIONS, District Judge.
These suits have been tried together upon one record, and are for infringement of two process claims (13 and 38) and three product claims (28, 30 and 31) of United States *455reissue letters patent No. 13,436, issued to plaintiff as assignee of P'ranlc G. Perkins, now deceased. The subject-matter of the patent and claims here in issue is a vegetable glue derived from starch or starchy products, having the adhesive strength and qualities of animal glue and suitable for gluing woods, especially veneers, and also the method or process of making such glue. The conclusions…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Solva Waterproof Glue Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- Perkins Glue Co. v. Solva Waterproof Glue Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Perkins Glue Co. v. Holland Furniture Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- Perkins Glue Co. v. Standard Furniture Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1922
- Perkins Glue Co. v. Holland Furniture Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1921
- Perkins Glue Co. v. Standard Furniture Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923