Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Morris Half Hour Laundromat

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1971No. Appeal, No. 22PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

At issue in this appeal is the nature and scope of the duty of an owner of a coin-operated laundromat to *546remit taxes to the Commonwealth under the provisions of the Tax Act of 1963 for Education, Act of March 6, 1956, P. L. (1955) 1228, as amended, 72 P.S. §3403-1 et seq.

Appellant Charles D. Morris, an individual trading and doing business under the name of Morris Half Hour Laundromat, owns and operates a chain of self-service coin-operated laundromats in and around Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The laundromats are unattended in the normal course of business, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Kelley v. KalodnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Rohm and Haas Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Eastern Auto Car Wash, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Cellco Partnership v. Lycoming County Board of AssessmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. J.G. Myers v. Com. of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API