United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Marshall
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Meyer, J.:
In December, 1976, an automobile was stolen from a dealer’s lot. The dealer’s insurance company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (appellant), paid the dealer for his car, received title to it, and then brought an action in replevin for the car against Henry L. Marshall, d/b/a Marshall’s Portable Service and Body Shop (appellee), who had repaired and painted the vehicle.
It develops that on March 2, 1977, a person calling himself “Aqureleza” brought the car to appellee requesting repairs and a paint job. Appellee never saw “Aqureleza” again.
The trial court granted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sharp v. SharpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Holiday Development Co. v. J. A. Tobin Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Clarke v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1920
- Minnesota Avenue, Inc. v. Automatic Packagers, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Witmer v. Estate of BrosiusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mai v. YoutseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Bank of America v. J. & S. AUTO REPAIRSArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Farrell v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Tom Growney Equipment, Inc. v. AnsleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Wheat v. FinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.