Legal Opinion

Mayer, Glassman & Gaines v. Washam (In Re Hanson)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 13, 1994No. BAP No. CC-94-1113-HJV. Bankruptcy No. LA 87-26186-KLPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAGAN, Bankruptcy Judge:

Debtors’ counsel, Mayer, Glassman & Gains (“MG & G”), submitted an application for allowance and payment of attorney’s fees and expenses. The bankruptcy court denied the application. MG & G appeals. We affirm.

I. Background

Harold and Linda Hanson (“debtors”) filed their joint petition for relief under chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code 1 on December 23, 1987.

On February 2, 1989, the Trustee filed a “Motion to Sell Real Property Free and Clear of Liens,” seeking an order approving the sale of the debtors’ residence. The Trustee did not object to the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Union Bank v. WolasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. In the Matter of Pizza of Hawaii, Inc., Debtor. Pizza of Hawaii, Inc. v. Shakey's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. In Re Pettibone Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. Kula (In Re Kula)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. In Re MednetUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. In Re KohlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re BergUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2001
  5. Quisenberry v. American State Bank (In Re Quisenberry)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API