Cutrell v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
The plaintiff brought this action at law to recover as beneficiary upon a life insurance policy which contained a clause providing for payment of double indemnity if death of the insured resulted from bodily injury sustained solely through external, violent and accidental means. Defendant admitted liability for and paid the face of the policy, $250, *552but denied liability for double indemnity.- Defendant contends that the gunshot wound sustained by the insured and death resulting therefrom was not effected solely through accidental means but was brought about by, and was the direct, natural and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- American Accident Co. v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- Railway Officials & Employes Accident Ass'n v. DrummondNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Grosvenor v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1918
- DeMello v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Kimball v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1973
- Mills v. Aetna Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Riley v. National Auto Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- City of Kimball v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Kimball v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.