Legal Opinion

Adamson v. Petersen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 1, 1886PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of Minneapolis.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

This action is for the alleged conversion, by the defendant, of 10,000 feet of one-inch pine lumber. The plaintiff’s interest is that of mortgagee, the mortgage having been executed to I him by one Nelson, the owner of the lumber, July 13, 1885. The defendant asserts title as purchaser from Nelson on the 16th day of July, 1885, and denies that the plaintiff’s mortgage included this I property. It appears by the evidence that Nelson was operating a planing-mill in Minneapolis, at No. 1,322 Washington avenue north. |The mortgage, received in evidence against the defendant’s objection, described…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atkins v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. M. T. Bank v. . F. M. Nat. BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Jellett v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Northwestern Cement & Concrete Pavement Co. v. Norwegian-Danish Evangelical Lutheran Augsburg SeminarySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Bonneviere v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. King v. HowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Brooks v. Bank of WetumpkaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Strickland v. Minnesota Type-Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API