Legal Opinion

Rud v. Fabian

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 31, 2007No. A06-2381PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment that grants an inmate’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and orders that good time that the inmate lost as a sanction for violating a prison disciplinary rule be reinstated. The judgment also orders the commissioner of corrections to create an administrative procedure for restoring good time lost as a result of a disciplinary violation. Because the statute that authorized the prison disciplinary rule that the inmate violated, as applied to the inmate, is an ex post facto law, we affirm the granting of the inmate’s petition and the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  3. Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota, ex rel., Branden Lee Pollard v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  2. John Excel Arradondo v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  3. State of Minnesota, ex rel. Anthony Alan Early v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  4. State of Minnesota, ex rel. Demetris L. Duncan v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API