Legal Opinion

Jockey Club v. Helvering

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 1, 1935No. 249PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Per curiam

We do not think that the petitioner was a “scientific” corporation within section 231 (6) of the Act of 1926, 26 USCA § 982 (6), and section 103 (6) of the Act of 1928, 26 USCA § 2103 (6), though in a loose sense it might be possible to find a scientific aspect to some of its activities. It was in part a horse breeder, maintaining an experimental breeding station and a breeding bureau; and it is quite true that until relatively modern times such knowledge of heredity as we had was- derived from those who bred domestic animals. It would be hard to deny the name of science to their lore. But…

2Cited by36 opinions

  1. Beck Chemical Equipment Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
  2. West Side Tennis Club v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. Chattanooga Automobile Club v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Warren Automobile Club, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  4. Bohemian Gymnastic Ass'n Sokol of City of NY v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. United Grocers, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1960

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API