Jockey Club v. Helvering
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
We do not think that the petitioner was a “scientific” corporation within section 231 (6) of the Act of 1926, 26 USCA § 982 (6), and section 103 (6) of the Act of 1928, 26 USCA § 2103 (6), though in a loose sense it might be possible to find a scientific aspect to some of its activities. It was in part a horse breeder, maintaining an experimental breeding station and a breeding bureau; and it is quite true that until relatively modern times such knowledge of heredity as we had was- derived from those who bred domestic animals. It would be hard to deny the name of science to their lore. But…
2Cited by36 opinions
- Beck Chemical Equipment Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
- West Side Tennis Club v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Chattanooga Automobile Club v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Warren Automobile Club, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Bohemian Gymnastic Ass'n Sokol of City of NY v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United Grocers, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1960
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.