Legal Opinion

Fulton National Bank v. Redmond

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1925No. 4694PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This case was taken to the Court of Appeals by direct bill of exceptions. The brief of evidence showed that certain evidence was admitted over stated objections, as follows: “The plaintiff in error (plaintiff below) objected to and moved to rule out all of the testimony of Bedmond in so far as it affects the bank, on the ground that any of the evidence about Project No. 9, as hereinbefore set out, is not a liquidated claim against Graves or the Graves Machinery Co., and that such items, if true, were not a defense against the notes in the hands of a bona fide purchaser after maturity, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kinard v. SanfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  2. Polk v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. Tinsley v. BeallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fulton National Bank v. RedmondCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API