Legal Opinion
State v. Zamora, 11-07-04 (12-26-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 26, 2007No. Nos. 11-07-04, 11-07-05PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} The defendant-appellant, Jason A. Zamora, appeals the judgment of conviction and sentencing filed by the Paulding County Common Pleas Court, as well as the court's judgment denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. On appeal, Zamora contends that the prosecutor deviated from the terms of the negotiated plea agreement when he made a sentencing recommendation; that his trial counsel was ineffective; and that the trial court failed to consider the principles and purposes of felony sentencing. For the reasons expressed herein, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
{¶ 2} On…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Hayes, 08ap-233 (3-12-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. WaltersOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Zamora, 11-08-04 (9-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- State v. Graham, 1-07-64 (3-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008