Legal Opinion
City of Pierre v. Russell
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1975No. File 11504PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNN, Chief Justice.
The defendant, Neil Cody Russell, was convicted of disorderly conduct in the municipal court of Pierre on May 21, 1974. Defendant appeals on the grounds that the Pierre municipal ordinance for disorderly conduct (Section 8-1-107) * contravenes the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution in that it is vague and overbroad on its face. Defendant does not contend that the ordinance was unconstitutional as it was applied to him. We affirm.
This charge arose from a police call to Ray’s Town and Country Cafe at about 3:30 a. m. on January…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Robinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Clem v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Green v. Siegel, Barnett & SchutzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. PiperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. Hy Vee Food Stores, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BergetSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.