Legal Opinion
McAfee v. Department of Revenue
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 29, 1994No. C9-93-1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
This is an appeal from the Commissioner of Veterans Affairs’ summary disposition of a veteran’s petition to enforce preference rights. We affirm the Commissioner’s holding that, as a matter of law, veteran’s preference credits do not apply to a temporary unclassified Attorney I position in the Department of Revenue and, therefore, Phillip McAfee was not denied veteran’s preference rights.
FACTS
The Minnesota Department of Revenue requested approval of a temporary unclassified Attorney I position in June 1992. The Minnesota Department of Employee Relations, which approves…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kollodge v. F. AND L. APPLIANCES, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Krumm v. R. A. Nadeau Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Soo Line Railroad v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hall v. City of ChamplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- Enterprise Leasing Company, Doing Business as Enterprise Rent-A-Car, a Minnesota Corporation v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Ojala v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Enterprise Leasing v. Metropolitan AirportCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001