Michael B. Selsor v. Stephen W. Kaiser
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-Appellant Michael B. Selsor appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of -habeas corpus. The judge rejected Selsor’s constitutional claim of denial of effective assistance of counsel where two public defenders were required by the state trial court to represent the interests of both Selsor and his codefendant Richard Dodson despite timely objections by the attorneys and Selsor that Dodson’s and Sel-sor’s interests conflicted. We disagree with the ruling below.
I
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On September 15,1975, a U-Tote-M store in Tulsa,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Paula McFarland v. Joan YukinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Hale v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Selsor v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Wisehart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- United States of America, Plainiff-Appellant v. Tracy ProwsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.