Legal Opinion

Michael B. Selsor v. Stephen W. Kaiser

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1996No. 94-5223PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-Appellant Michael B. Selsor appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of -habeas corpus. The judge rejected Selsor’s constitutional claim of denial of effective assistance of counsel where two public defenders were required by the state trial court to represent the interests of both Selsor and his codefendant Richard Dodson despite timely objections by the attorneys and Selsor that Dodson’s and Sel-sor’s interests conflicted. We disagree with the ruling below.

I

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On September 15,1975, a U-Tote-M store in Tulsa,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Paula McFarland v. Joan YukinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Hale v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Selsor v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. Wisehart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. United States of America, Plainiff-Appellant v. Tracy ProwsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API