Legal Opinion

DePinto v. Provident Security Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1967No. 20553PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:

This stockholder’s derivative action, based on diversity of citizenship, was originally brought on behalf of United Security Life (United), an Arizona stock insurance corporation, by John S. Gorsuch, a citizen of Ohio. The defendants were Angus J. DePinto, Edwin B. Pegram, Francis I. Sabo, Hjalmar B. Landoe, Elmer W. Duhame, together with eight other personal defendants and three companies in addition to United. With regard to DePinto and certain other defendants, damages in the sum of $447,633.70 were sought, including an item for $314,794.19, based on a transaction…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Olender v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Depinto v. Provident Security Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Dit La Porte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Provident Security Life Insurance Company v. John S. GorsuchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Depinto v. Provident Security Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API