Legal Opinion

Baber v. Baessell

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 17, 1936No. 6621PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

This case arises upon a writ of error to the Municipal Court of the District of Columbia. The suit was an action brought by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below (hereinafter called . plaintiff) for alleged breach of a contract to build a dwelling house. The defendants in error, defendants below (hereinafter called defendants) themselves sought an affirmative judgment against the plaintiff. The case was tried to a. court and jury. There was a verdict in favor of the defendants in the sum of $550. The questions in the case involve the propriety of the trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. MacKnight Flintic Stone Co. v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Filbert v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Mercantile Trust Co. v. HenseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1906
  5. Weld v. GoldenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fortune v. EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Waterman v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Georgetown Development Corp. v. GranatCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API