Legal Opinion

Harris v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1953No. Civ. Nos. 3851, 3852Published

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, Chief Judge.

The Crow River flows north through the Village of New London, Minnesota. Within the boundaries of this village, an artificial dam across the river has been in existence for approximately a century. A mill was formerly located near the dam and utilized the water power which the dam created. In 1938, the State of Minnesota became the owner of the dam and the surrounding property. Apparently the State obtained this property to control the water level for scenic purposes in that'the water in the Crow River above the dam became a sizable lake, and also to supply water for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gimmestad v. Rose Brothers Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Meagher v. HirtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Harning v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Hodges v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API