Noelle Brennan v. Global Brass and Cop
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
The appellants are lawyers who represented the plaintiff in this employment discrimination case. One of the defendants, Global Brass and Copper, Inc., moved the district court for sanctions, pursuant both to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(b) and (c)(1) and to the court’s inherent authority to impose sanctions for frivolous litigation. Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 45-46, 111 S.Ct. 2123, 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991); Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752, 764-65, 100 S.Ct. 2455, 65 L.Ed.2d 488 (1980); Carr v. Tillery, 591 F.3d 909, 919-20 (7th Cir.2010). The basis for the motion…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Carr v. TilleryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Mro Communications, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, Now At&t Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Halim v. Great Gatsby's Auction Gallery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
3Cited by15 opinions
- David Feldman v. Olin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Perez v. AC Roosevelt Food Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- S.L. Ex Rel. Loof v. Upland Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Timothy Upchurch v. Timothy O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- Perez v. AC Roosevelt Food Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.