Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Goggin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 11, 1992PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

This is the Commonwealth’s interlocutory appeal (transferred by us from the Appeals Court) from an allowance by a Superior Court judge of the defendants’ motions to suppress evidence obtained by the Somerville police as a result of searching the defendants’ apartment. In allowing the defendants’ motions, the judge ruled that the police had violated the “knock and announce” rule in executing the warrant which authorized the search.

The judge made the following findings of fact with regard to the execution of the search warrant. On June 8, 1990, at 7:10 p.m., eight officers of the Somerville…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CundriffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. SepulvedaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. ManniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Adcock v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. ByfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. GrimshawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. WatsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API