Zelnick v. Adams
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
G. STEVEN AGEE, Justice.
In Zelnick v. Adams, 263 Va. 601 , 561 S.E.2d 711 (2002), ( Zelnick I ), we held that "a contract for legal services is within the `general classes of necessaries' that may defeat a plea of infancy." Id. at 611, 561 S.E.2d at 717 . We remanded the case for further proceedings "on the issue of the factual determination of necessity `under all the circumstances.'" Id. at 612, 561 S.E.2d at 718 . The trial court, on remand, determined the legal services at issue were not "`necessities' under all the circumstances of [the] case." For the reasons set forth below, we will…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eure v. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- Caplan v. BogardSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- Temple v. City of PetersburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
- Hurdle v. PrinzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- Strother v. Lynchburg Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jonathan Brenton Griffin v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2023
- Telegraph Square II, A Condominium Unit Owners v. 7205 Telegraph Square, LLCCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2023
- Telegraph Square II, A Condominium Unit Owners v. 7205 Telegraph Square, LLCCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2023
- Telegraph Square II, A Condominium Unit Owners v. 7205 Telegraph Square, LLCCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2023
- Timothy Holley v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.