Zausner v. Fotochrome Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.
Both the corporate defendant and the individual defendant, the chairman of its hoard of directors, attack herein all six causes of action of the complaint, pursuant to rules 103 and 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Initially, however, it is noted that the notice of motion fails to specify any particular parts of the complaint, beyond entire causes of action, which are sought to be stricken as either repetitious, redundant or immaterial, in accordance with rule 103 aforesaid. Such failure is fatally defective to this branch of the motion (Schwartz v. Marjolet, Inc., 214 App. Div. 530),…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Gale v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Scheman v. SchleinNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Kharas v. Barron G. Collier, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- O'Brien v. B. L. M. Bates Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- John Street Leasehold, LLC v. Capital Management Resources, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001