Legal Opinion

Gene Andrew Austad v. Henry Risley and Thomas Sellars, and Attorney General Mike Greely, Additional And

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 31, 1984No. 83-3933Published

1Opinion of the Court

739 F.2d 428

Gene Andrew AUSTAD, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Henry RISLEY and Thomas Sellars, Respondents-Appellees,

and

Attorney General Mike Greely, Additional Respondent and Appellee.

No. 83-3933.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 9, 1984.

Decided July 31, 1984.

Curtis G. Thompson, Jardine, Stephenson, Blewett & Weaver, Great Falls, Mont., for petitioner-appellant.

Margaret M. Joyce Johnson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Helena, Mont., for respondents-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana.

Before WRIGHT, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Patton v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API