Legal Opinion
Fetters v. Wittmer Oil & Gas Properties
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 1932No. Docket No. 199, Calendar No. 36,061Published
1OpinionNorth, J.
I concur in holding plaintiffs are not equitably entitled to cancellation.
Bittzel, J., concurred with North, J.
Clark, C. J. I am not in accord with opinion of Mr. Justice Sharpe. Defendants may not use in their defense the champertous agreement between plaintiff and a third party, not a party thereto, and to that point only, the following, from 11 C. J. p. 270:
“Except in one State (Wisconsin), the rule is well settled that the fact that there is a champertous contract in relation to the prosecution of the suit between plaintiff and his attorney, or between plaintiff and another layman, in no…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allison v. C. & N. W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Woods v. WalshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- D. M. Osborne & Co. v. ShillingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Hemphill v. OrloffMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Foley v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.