Legal Opinion

Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California Corporation Pg & E Corporation v. People of the State of California, Ex. Rel. California Dept of Toxic Substances Control, Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board, State Water Resources Control Board, Lahontan Regional Water Quality Board, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Regional Quality Control Board, California Dept Fish and Game, California Dept of Forestry and Fire Protection, California Dept Water Resources, California Environmental Protection Agency, California Highway Patrol, California Dept of Education, Bay Conservation Development Commission, Resources Agency, State Lands Commission, California Dept of Parks and Recreation, California Dept General Services, California Coastal Commission People of the State of California, Ex. Rel. California Dept Transportation City and County of San Francisco California Hydropower Reform Coalition California Public Utilities Commission, and City of Redwood City California Counties of Alameda, Fresno, Kern, Sacramento, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Siskiyou, Sonoma, and the City and County of San Francisco United States of America, on Behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, People of the State of California, Ex. Rel. California Dept Transportation City and County of San Francisco California Hydropower Reform Coalition California Public Utilities Commission v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 2003No. 02-16990PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

350 F.3d 932

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, a California corporation; PG & E Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

People of the State of CALIFORNIA, ex. rel. CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL, Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board, State Water Resources Control Board, Lahontan Regional Water Quality Board, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Regional Quality Control Board, California Dept Fish and Game, California Dept of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kathy Kroske, an Individual v. Us Bank Corp., a Foreign Corporation Dba U.S. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Motor Vehicle Casualty Co. v. Thorpe Insulation Co. (In Re Thorpe Insulation Co.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. In Re Federal-Mogul Global Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  4. Megal Development Corp. v. ShadofWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Irving Tanning Co. v. Maine Superintendent of Insurance (Irving Tanning Co.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API