Legal Opinion

Columbus Heating & Ventilating Co. v. Burt

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1928No. 6339PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

This is a suit in trover to recover a furnace sold by plaintiff to defendant under a written contract which contained the following: “It is further agreed that the furnace and all materials shall remain our personal property until the whole sum of $185 has been fully paid, or in case we shall accept as payment or part payment for said warm-air apparatus materials any note or notes, until any or all such note or notes and every renewal or renewals thereof shall be fully paid; and you further agree that if you do not pay for said heating apparatus as above specified, you will allow heating…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. OdomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Power v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Armour & Co. v. BlockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Babson Credit Plan, Inc. v. Cordele Production Credit Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Holland Furnace Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Lasch v. Columbus Heating & Ventilating Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  4. Skinner v. Stewart Plumbing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Williams v. Ideal Plumbing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API