Legal Opinion
Zapata v. Companion Property and Casualty Insurance Co.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided November 20, 2019No. 1:19-cv-22686Unknown
1Opinion
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida PZP Investments, Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 19-22686-Civ-Scola Companion Property and Casualty ) Insurance Co. and Clarendon National Insurance Co., Defendants. Order on Motion to Intervene Now before the Court is the Plaintiff PZP Investments’ motion1 to intervene as a third-party defendant. For the following reasons, the Court denies PZP Investments’ motion to intervene. (ECF No. 47.) 1. Background PZP Investments (“PZP”) sued the insurance companies to collect on a judgment for $358,848.93 entered against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lawton Chiles, Jr., Bob Martinez, Metropolitan Dade County, Intervenors-Appellants v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Georgia v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Mt. Hawley Insurance v. Sandy Lake Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. Falls Chase Special Taxing DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Tig Specialty Insurance v. Financial Web.Com, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2002