Legal Opinion

Honolulu Rapid Transit v. Hawaiian Tramways Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Original Submission.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

GALBRAITH, J.

The facts of this controversy as set forth in the submission signed by the parties thereto, are as follows, to wit:

1. “That the said Tramways Company, as authorized by law, is operating a street railway or tramway in Honolulu in the Territory of Hawaii and occupies a single track with switches and turnouts on King street from the "Waikiki road to a point near the government pumping station at Kalihi. Said Tramways Company proposes to lay a double track, other than the necessary turnouts and switches, along said King street and to operate thereon a tramway…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  3. North Chicago City Railway Co. v. Town of Lake ViewIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Oleson v. BorthwickHawaii Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Carter v. Territory of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co. v. TerritoryHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Kahua Ranch, Ltd. v. HustaceHawaii Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API