Legal Opinion

Malloy v. Commissioner of Social Security.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 13, 2009No. 08-2776UnpublishedCited by 294 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

We must decide whether the district court erred in affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of Appellant Amelia Malloy’s claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“the Act”). We conclude that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s decision that Malloy was capable of performing a significant number of light and sedentary jobs in the national economy, including her past work at a day care center, and that she thus was not entitled to disability…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by294 opinions

  1. Cummings v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Gonzalez v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. ACHILLE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. ADESANYA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  5. ANGELO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

289 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API