Legal Opinion

McQueen v. Estridge

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 28, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

In March, 1922, the appellant, Thomas McQueen-,, executed a deed to the appellee, Marion Estridge, for the recited consideration of $1,600, of which $1,000 was. «ash and $600 payable twelve months thereafter. No note was made for the balance. The deed was put away by Estridge without being recorded. At maturity he paid McQueen $500 and $30 interest. In 1930, Estridge filed this suit against McQueen, alleging that the consideration for the land was $1,500 and not $1,600, which had been recited in the deed through fraud or mistake. He asked…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Apple v. McCulloughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Piney Oil Gas Company v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Commonwealth v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Harshbarger v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Potter v. BaynesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Fontana v. FontanaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API