Legal Opinion

Schwankl v. Davis

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 23, 2004No. 02SC810PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey

I. Introduction

In this case, we interpret a “Good Samaritan” statute, section 16-3-203 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, which awards court costs and attorney fees to anyone who has successfully defended against a lawsuit resulting from that person “having sought to prevent a crime being committed against any other person.” § 16-3-203, 6 C.R.S. (2003). We hold that this statute not only protects people who attempt to stop a crime already underway, but also encompasses people who seek to prevent future crimes. We further hold that to qualify for protection under this statute, a person must…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. AviComm, Inc. v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Davis v. SchwanklColorado Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. TABOR Foundation v. Regional Transportation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. In re the Marriage of HuntColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. In re Becker v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.AColorado Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API